A number of Catholic bloggers have been wondering: Why is the NY Times going into full bore tilt re: the Pope and his alleged cover up for a Pedophie.
I came across this article from the Priestly Pugilist, an Australian, and his theory seems plausible to me, that it's a bit of a collusion between the NY Times and Obana for getting back at the church for not supporting ObamaCare and for the Church giving Obama a hard time. The story is OLD news, covered well over a decade ago.
In short I don't think this is implausible. Granted, you have to Be able to prove the NY Times and Zero colluded on this, but I don't think it's more than a half-inch jump. Especially given that Hussein repeated tried to foist pro-abortion diplomats to represent the US to the Holy See - in a blatant in your face move.
If Barrack HUSSEIN Obama treats Jewish Netanyahu like garbage at an official White House meeting, do you think he gives a flip about the pope? It's "payback time" the Thugocracy way. Put the POPE on Front page news in holy Week, so Hussein can run for the sewer with all the back room deals he cut on his DeathCare deal.
Ruin Holy week coverage so the news can be all over the "hypocracy" of the Pope instead of the Message of the Resurrection. SOP for the left-wing.
Else why dredge up and rehash a story they wrote about 15 years ago?
It wasn't as if the NY Times wasn't Obama's biggest cheer leader all through out his campaign. It wasn't as if the NY Times wasn't in constant make-Christians-look-bad mode all the time. Anything to ruin Easter and they'll do it.
[BTW, for the first time since the White House Easter egg roll was started, which schools WEREN'T invited? Oh, Catholic ones....]